Ment Funding $100K vs FundedNext Stellar 2 Step $100K: Full Rule-by-Rule Comparison

Quick answer: As of July 20, 2026, these two $100K challenges differ on almost every structural axis. Ment Funding $100K is a single-step evaluation with a 10% target, a tight 6% static max drawdown, a 5% daily loss limit, and just a 1-day minimum, priced at $1105 ($828.75 with code GORILLA). FundedNext Stellar 2 Step $100K is a two-step evaluation with an 8% then 5% target, a wider 10% static max drawdown, the same 5% daily loss limit, and a 5-day-per-step minimum, priced far lower at $530 (code GORILLA). FundedNext is dramatically cheaper and gives more drawdown room; Ment is a faster single-step path with a much higher price. Choose FundedNext Stellar 2 Step $100K for cost and drawdown headroom; choose Ment Funding $100K if a single-step evaluation with a 1-day minimum is worth the premium.

The Matchup at a Glance

• Ment Funding $100K: $1105 ($828.75 with code GORILLA), 1-step evaluation, Trustpilot 4.8 (231 reviews).
• FundedNext Stellar 2 Step $100K: $530 (code GORILLA), 2-step evaluation, Trustpilot 4.5 (72990 reviews).

Evaluation Rules Compared

The two evaluations share only a few points: both are $100K accounts, both use a static drawdown measurement, both apply a 5% daily loss limit, and both allow news trading (Ment with restrictions). Activation fees, consistency rules, and reset fees are not listed on either plan.

Where they differ:

• Price: FundedNext Stellar 2 Step $100K is far cheaper at $530 with code GORILLA, versus $828.75 with code GORILLA (list $1105) for Ment Funding $100K.
• Evaluation model: Ment Funding $100K is a single-step evaluation, while FundedNext Stellar 2 Step $100K requires clearing two steps.
• Profit target: Ment Funding $100K asks for 10% in one stage; FundedNext Stellar 2 Step $100K asks for 8% in step 1 then 5% in step 2.
• Max drawdown: Ment Funding $100K allows a tight 6% static max drawdown, whereas FundedNext Stellar 2 Step $100K allows a wider 10% static max drawdown.
• Minimum trading days: Ment Funding $100K requires just 1 trading day to pass, while FundedNext Stellar 2 Step $100K requires 5 per step.

FundedNext favors traders who want a much lower price and more drawdown room; Ment favors traders who want a single-step path with a 1-day minimum and are willing to pay a premium.

Funded Rules Compared

On the funded side both plans keep their evaluation drawdown and daily loss rules (a 5% daily loss limit on both), require only a 1-day minimum to trade, and allow news trading with conditions attached on each.

• Profit split: Ment Funding $100K starts at a 75% split (rising to 90% for 20% more), while FundedNext Stellar 2 Step $100K starts at 80% and rises to 95% with the addon.
• Max drawdown: The funded Ment Funding $100K keeps the tighter 6% static drawdown, versus the wider 10% static drawdown on the funded FundedNext Stellar 2 Step $100K.
• Max allocation: Ment Funding $100K lists a $2M max allocation, while FundedNext Stellar 2 Step $100K lists $300K upgrading with tiers up to $4M.
• Payout policy: Ment Funding $100K allows a first withdrawal anytime but then requires a 30-day wait from your first trading day per request; FundedNext Stellar 2 Step $100K allows the first withdrawal 21 days after your first trade, then every 14 days.

Which Plan Should You Choose?

Choose Ment Funding $100K if you want a single-step evaluation with a 1-day minimum and a $2M max allocation, and the higher $828.75 price and tighter 6% drawdown are acceptable trade-offs.

Choose FundedNext Stellar 2 Step $100K if you want a much lower price ($530 with code GORILLA), a wider 10% drawdown, and a higher potential split (up to 95% with the addon), and don't mind a two-step evaluation.

The real trade-off is Ment's fast, expensive single-step path against FundedNext's cheaper two-step path with more drawdown room and a higher top-end split.

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Ment Funding $100K or FundedNext Stellar 2 Step $100K?

FundedNext Stellar 2 Step $100K is much cheaper at $530 with code GORILLA, versus $828.75 with code GORILLA (list $1105) for Ment Funding $100K. That is roughly a $300 difference after discounts, making FundedNext the clear budget option here.

Do both plans use the same drawdown?

Both use a static drawdown, but the ceilings differ: Ment Funding $100K caps max drawdown at 6%, while FundedNext Stellar 2 Step $100K caps it at 10%. The 5% daily loss limit is identical on both.

Which is easier or faster to pass?

Ment Funding $100K is faster in structure because it is a single 10% stage with just a 1-day minimum. FundedNext Stellar 2 Step $100K spreads the target across two steps (8% then 5%) with a 5-day-per-step minimum, but gives you a wider 10% drawdown. If speed is the priority, Ment's single step wins; if drawdown room matters more, FundedNext has the edge.

Which pays more once funded?

FundedNext Stellar 2 Step $100K has the higher ceiling: it starts at an 80% split rising to 95% with the addon, versus Ment Funding $100K's 75% default rising to 90% for an extra 20%. Payout timing differs too: Ment allows a first withdrawal anytime then a 30-day wait per request, while FundedNext allows the first at 21 days then every 14 days.

Data captured from the Prop Firm Gorilla comparison tool on July 20, 2026. Every effort is made to ensure accuracy, but always verify rules and pricing directly with each firm before purchasing — prop firm rules change frequently.