FundingPips 1 Step $50K vs FundingPips 2 Step Standard $50K 8% Phase 1: Full Rule-by-Rule Comparison

Quick answer: As of July 20, 2026, this is an intra-firm matchup: both the FundingPips 1 Step $50K and the FundingPips 2 Step Standard $50K 8% Phase 1 come from FundingPips, so the firm, platforms, funded split structure, and payout methods are identical. The real story is the evaluation model. The 1 Step plan clears in a single phase with one 10% profit target but runs a tighter risk box: a 6% static max drawdown and a 3% daily loss limit. The 2 Step plan splits the goal into an 8% Step 1 and a 5% Step 2, and in return gives more room with an 8% drawdown and a 5% daily loss limit, at a slightly lower price of $239.2 versus $257.6 after code. Both keep the same $2M funded allocation and cycle-based payouts. Choose the 1 Step if you want the fastest single-phase route; choose the 2 Step if you want more daily and total risk room and the lower price.

The Matchup at a Glance

• FundingPips 1 Step $50K: $322 ($257.6 with code GORILLA), 1-step evaluation, Trustpilot 4.5 (62082 reviews).
• FundingPips 2 Step Standard $50K 8% Phase 1: $299 ($239.2 with code GORILLA), 2-step evaluation, Trustpilot 4.5 (62082 reviews).

Evaluation Rules Compared

Because both plans are FundingPips products, they share the same firm, the same MT5, cTrader, and Match-Trader platforms, and both require 3 minimum trading days and allow news trading. Neither plan lists an activation fee, an evaluation-stage consistency rule, a reset fee, or a concrete max-leverage figure in this data.

Where they differ:

• Evaluation model: The FundingPips 1 Step $50K clears in a single phase with one 10% target, while the FundingPips 2 Step Standard $50K 8% Phase 1 splits into an 8% Step 1 and a 5% Step 2.
• Max drawdown: The 1 Step runs a tighter 6% static drawdown, while the 2 Step allows 8%.
• Daily loss limit: The 1 Step caps daily loss at 3%, versus 5% on the 2 Step.
• Price: The 2 Step is slightly cheaper at $239.2 (code GORILLA) versus the 1 Step at $257.6 (code GORILLA).

The evaluation model is the whole decision here: the 1 Step is one phase but a tighter risk box (6% drawdown, 3% daily), while the 2 Step trades an extra phase for more room (8% drawdown, 5% daily) and a lower price.

Funded Rules Compared

Once funded, the two plans are nearly identical because they are the same firm: both use the same cycle-based split (60% weekly up to 100% monthly), the same 35% consistency rule on the on-demand add-on, the same $2M max allocation, the same payout policy, and the same Rise, Bank Transfer, and Crypto methods, with news trading allowed under restrictions.

• Max drawdown: The funded FundingPips 1 Step $50K keeps its tighter 6% static drawdown, while the 2 Step keeps 8%.
• Daily loss limit: The funded 1 Step holds a 3% daily loss limit, versus 5% on the 2 Step.
• Minimum trading days: On standard add-ons the funded 1 Step needs 4 minimum trading days, while the 2 Step needs 16; both drop to 3 on the on-demand add-on.

Which Plan Should You Choose?

Choose FundingPips 1 Step $50K if you want a single-phase evaluation with one 10% target and are comfortable trading inside a tighter 6% drawdown and 3% daily loss limit, and want fewer funded minimum days on standard add-ons.

Choose FundingPips 2 Step Standard $50K 8% Phase 1 if you want more risk room (8% drawdown, 5% daily loss), smaller staged targets of 8% then 5%, and the slightly lower price of $239.2 after code.

The real trade-off is speed versus room: one 10% phase in a tighter risk box, or two smaller targets with more daily and total drawdown to work with.

FAQ

Which is cheaper, the FundingPips 1 Step $50K or the 2 Step Standard $50K 8% Phase 1?

The FundingPips 2 Step Standard $50K 8% Phase 1 is slightly cheaper after code at $239.2 (code GORILLA), versus the FundingPips 1 Step $50K at $257.6 (code GORILLA), a difference of about $18.

Do both plans use the same drawdown?

No. The FundingPips 1 Step $50K uses a tighter 6% static max drawdown ($3,000 on $50K) with a 3% ($1,500) daily loss limit, while the 2 Step Standard $50K 8% Phase 1 uses an 8% static drawdown ($4,000) with a 5% ($2,500) daily loss limit.

Which evaluation model is easier or faster to pass?

The 1 Step is faster because it is a single phase, but its one 10% target sits inside a tighter 6% drawdown, so there is less room for error. The 2 Step takes two phases (8% then 5%) but gives more daily and total risk room; both require 3 minimum trading days in evaluation.

Which pays more once funded?

They pay the same, because both are FundingPips accounts using the identical cycle-based split: 60% weekly, 80% bi-weekly, 90% on demand, and 100% monthly, up to the same $2M allocation. Your payout cycle, not the evaluation model, decides the split.

Data captured from the Prop Firm Gorilla comparison tool on July 20, 2026. Every effort is made to ensure accuracy, but always verify rules and pricing directly with each firm before purchasing — prop firm rules change frequently.