
Quick answer: As of July 20, 2026, the FTMO Standard 1 Step $50K and the FundingPips 1 Step $50K are both single-phase $50K forex challenges with the same 10% profit target ($5,000) and the same 3% daily loss limit ($1,500). The differences that matter are price (FTMO is $367.67 with code GORILLA versus FundingPips at $322, or $257.6 with code GORILLA), the drawdown (FTMO allows a 10% end-of-day trailing drawdown while FundingPips uses a tighter 6% static drawdown), the minimum trading days (2 for FTMO versus 3 for FundingPips), and the funded payout structure. Choose FundingPips 1 Step $50K for the lower entry price and larger scaling ceiling, or FTMO Standard 1 Step $50K for the looser drawdown and a simple flat 90% split.
| Evaluation Rule | FTMO Standard 1 Step $50K | FundingPips 1 Step $50K |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $367.67 (code GORILLA) | $322 ($257.6 with code GORILLA) |
| Activation fee | Not listed | Not listed |
| Evaluation model | 1-step | 1-step |
| Profit target | 10% | 10% |
| Max drawdown | 10% (EOD) | 6% (Static) |
| Daily loss limit | 3% | 3% |
| Minimum trading days | 2 | 3 |
| Consistency rule | 50% | Not listed |
| News trading | Yes | Yes |
| Max leverage | 1:100 | 1:30 |
| Reset fee | Not listed | Not listed |
Both are one-step $50K evaluations that share the same 10% profit target ($5,000), the same 3% daily loss limit ($1,500), and both allow news trading. Neither firm lists an activation fee, a reset fee, or a maximum leverage figure in the comparison tool.
Where they differ:
On evaluation rules alone, FTMO favors traders who want a looser drawdown and a faster pass, while FundingPips favors those prioritizing the lowest entry price.
| Funded Rule | FTMO Standard 1 Step $50K | FundingPips 1 Step $50K |
|---|---|---|
| Profit split | 90% | "Weekly" 60% "Bi-Weekly" 80% "Monthly" 100% "On Demand" 90% |
| Max drawdown | 10% (EOD) | 6% (Static) |
| Daily loss limit | 3% | 3% |
| Consistency rule | 50% | 35% (ONLY on "on demand" addon) |
| Minimum trading days | 1 | 4 on other addons OR 3 "On demand" addon |
| Max leverage | 1:100 | 1:30 |
| Max allocation | $400K | $2M |
| News trading | Yes (Except tier 1) | Yes (with restrictions) |
| Payout policy | 14 calendar-day wait from first trade; $20 bank / $50 crypto fees deducted | Must meet the profit target for each cycle and addon selected |
| Payout methods | Wire Transfer, Visa Direct, Mastercard Send, Skrill, Crypto | Rise, Bank Transfer, Crypto |
Once funded, both accounts keep the same 3% daily loss limit and carry over the same drawdown model from their evaluations. Neither firm lists a maximum leverage figure for the funded stage.
Choose FTMO Standard 1 Step $50K if you want a looser 10% end-of-day drawdown, only 2 minimum trading days, and a simple flat 90% profit split.
Choose FundingPips 1 Step $50K if you want the lower entry price ($257.6 with code GORILLA), a much larger $2M scaling ceiling, and can trade within a tighter 6% static drawdown.
The real trade-off is FTMO's looser drawdown and flat 90% split versus FundingPips' lower price and far bigger scaling ceiling.
The FundingPips 1 Step $50K is cheaper. It costs $322, or $257.6 with code GORILLA, compared with $367.67 for the FTMO Standard 1 Step $50K with code GORILLA. FundingPips is the lower-cost entry to a funded $50K account in this matchup.
No. The FTMO Standard 1 Step $50K uses a 10% end-of-day (EOD) drawdown ($5,000 on a $50K account), while the FundingPips 1 Step $50K uses a tighter 6% static drawdown ($3,000). FTMO gives you more room, but the FundingPips static figure does not trail your balance upward.
Both are one-step evaluations with the same 10% profit target. The FTMO Standard 1 Step $50K can be passed slightly faster because it requires only 2 minimum trading days versus 3 for FundingPips, and its 10% EOD drawdown is more forgiving than FundingPips' 6% static drawdown. FundingPips is the tighter test on risk.
It depends on cadence. The FTMO Standard 1 Step $50K pays a flat 90% profit split. The FundingPips 1 Step $50K pays 60% weekly, 80% bi-weekly, 90% on demand, or 100% monthly, so a FundingPips trader willing to wait for monthly payouts can earn a higher split, while FTMO offers a consistent 90% regardless of timing. FundingPips also allows scaling up to $2M versus FTMO's $400K.
Data captured from the Prop Firm Gorilla comparison tool on July 20, 2026. Every effort is made to ensure accuracy, but always verify rules and pricing directly with each firm before purchasing — prop firm rules change frequently.